In a traditional state machine, the machine is always inĪ single state. The most basic state machine concepts are 3.3, 3.5 and eventĬontains a set of transitions that define how it reacts to events.Įvents can be generated by the state machine itself or by externalĮntities. Provides the capability of communicating with external 5 Data Model and Data Manipulationĭefines constructs for storing and modifying data, while 6 External Communications That the state machine can take in response to events. Is a logical extension of CCXML's state and event notation.Įxecutable Content contains an extensible set of actions This document is to combine Harel semantics with an XML syntax that However, and hence do not have an XML representation. They have been defined as a graphical specification language, Out semantics for sophisticated constructs such as parallel states. Harel State Tables are a state machine notation that wasĭeveloped by the mathematician David Harel and is included in UML The CCXML 1.0 specification defines both a state machine andĮvent handing syntax and a standardized set of call controlĮlements. Language designed to support call control features in VoiceĪpplications (specifically including VoiceXML but not limited to
General-purpose event-based state machine language that combinesĬoncepts from CCXML and Harel State Tables. This document outlines State Chart XML (SCXML), which is a The sections of this document are normative unless otherwise This document is governed by the 14 October 2005 W3C Has actual knowledge of a patent which the individual believesĮssential Claim(s) must disclose the information in accordance Includes instructions for disclosing a patent. W3C maintains a public list of any patent disclosures made inĬonnection with the deliverables of the group that page also This document was produced by a group operating under the 5 TheĪuthors of this document are members of the Voice Browser Working This document has been produced as part of the Voice Browser Activity (activity statement),įollowing the procedures set out for the W3C Process. This enhances the functionality and interoperability of W3C's role in making the Recommendation is toĭraw attention to the specification and to promote its widespreadĭeployment. It is a stableĭocument and may be used as reference material or cited fromĪnother document. This document has been reviewed by W3C Members, by softwareĭevelopers, and by other W3C groups and interested parties, and isĮndorsed by the Director as a W3C Recommendation. However, there are no substantial changes from the On a public comment, updated the broken link for E4X, and fixed typos. The Working Group removed an unused reference to ECMASCRIPT-327 based Implementation Report, along with the associated test suite. (see the Third Last Call Working Draft Disposition of Comments)Īnd satisfies the Working Group's technical requirements. This specification has been widely reviewed Revision of this technical report can be found in the W3C technical reports index at A list of current W3C publications and the latest Other documents may supersede thisĭocument. This section describes the status of this document at the Please refer to the errata for this document, which may include normative corrections. Raman, (until 2005, when at IBM) Klaus Reifenrath, (until 2006, when at Nuance) No'am Rosenthal, (until 2009, when at Nokia) Johan Roxendal, Invited Expert Burnett, Voxeo Jerry Carter, (until 2008, when at Nuance) Scott McGlashan, (until 2011, when at HP) Torbjörn Lager, Invited Expert Mark Helbing, (until 2006, when at Nuance) Rafah Hosn, (until 2008, when at IBM) T.V. Recommendation 1 September 2015 This version: Latest version: Previous version: Editors: Jim Barnett, Genesys (Editor-in-Chief) Rahul Akolkar, IBM RJ Auburn, Voxeo Michael Bodell, (until 2012, when at Microsoft) Daniel C. Machine Notation for Control Abstraction W3C
0 kommentar(er)
